what a difference 47 years makes

(Beck image from AP via http://bit.ly/cFANHy, MLK image from UPI via http://bit.ly/d4zC2S)

Reading through the coverage of Glenn Beck’s “Restoring Honor” rally, I was struck by the classification of the event as more religious than political, and how that compared to Rev. King’s speech of 1963. Despite the fact that Beck claimed ignorance of the anniversary of King’s speech when he chose the date, he has since touted his event as a reclamation of the Civil Rights movement from political forces.  Leaving aside the questionable framing of a difference of opinions on tax cuts and ideas like “social justice” as an impingement on a group’s civil rights, hearing about Beck’s calls for a spiritual re-awakening made me think about the difference in the nature of the appeals made on August 28, 1963 and August 28, 2010.

In Rev. King’s “I Have A Dream” speech, we had a man of the cloth making an appeal not to religion, but to a sense of common humanity shared by everyone:

There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights, “When will you be satisfied?” We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality. We can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities. We cannot be satisfied as long as the negro’s basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one. We can never be satisfied as long as our children are stripped of their self-hood and robbed of their dignity by signs stating: “For Whites Only.” We cannot be satisfied as long as a Negro in Mississippi cannot vote and a Negro in New York believes he has nothing for which to vote. No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until “justice rolls down like waters, and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

The goal of King’s civil rights movement was equal treatment for African-Americans on issues ranging from everyday things, like hotel lodgings, to horrific things, like police brutality. He made his case for this equality not by appealing to a higher power (he mentions God only once in his speech), or to his own authority as a well-known leader of the civil rights movement, but by highlighting the things that African-Americans endured that no compassionate person would wish upon anyone. His appeal was overtly political, saying that he had come to Washington DC to seek fulfillment of the promises made by the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, and warning of the dangers of invocations of “interposition” and “nullification” (a trumping of federal law by state law) by “vicious racists” in Alabama.

Beck’s appeal was the opposite.  Though billed as non-political, the messaging assumed a certain political ideology among its targets. Beck portrayed an America on the brink of disaster, saying “we must advance or perish, and I choose advance.” Sarah Palin had a similar message: “We must not fundamentally transform America, as some would want. We must restore America and restore her honor.” But instead of appealing to universal values to support for their point, they appealed to a higher power, saying that “America today begins to turn back to God.” In Beck’s eyes, a return to God (and thus religious rather than secular values) will lead to the policy outcomes necessary to halt the troubling trend of our nation.

This is not to say that Rev. King was not a religious man; clearly he was.  Nor am I suggesting that the values taught by religion are not a good basis for making policy (though clearly there is a wide range of policy outcomes that can arise from religious values).  But the differences between the approach used by King 47 years ago and the approach used by Beck yesterday speak to the power of their respective messages. Rev. King downplayed the significance of religion in his speech, relying instead on the universal applicability of his message to make his point.  In contrast, Beck relies on religion, and in doing so admits that his vision is exclusive rather than universal.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to what a difference 47 years makes

  1. Nicholas Kramer says:

    This whole controversy is a sham, with the mainstream media as usual focusing on complete non-issues rather than anything remotely important. The anniversary of the officially-recognized “I Have a Dream” speech is meaningless, and the way we can know that is that the holiday was declared by the powerful (the US congress). When have the powerful ever embraced anyone or anything that stands for the rights of the powerless, except in an effort to co-opt and corrupt their memory and message? Dr. King first gave his “I Have a Dream” message in Detriot, several months before the DC speech… the day doesn’t matter, only the message.

    See the below link from your alma mater for a speech you almost never hear about. After this speech, many of the other leaders of the civil rights movement distanced themselves from Dr. King, as did most editorial boards of newspapers around the country. A year later, he was assassinated. It’s easy for everyone to say they’re are the philosophical decedents of MLK because we have packaged his message in a corporate-friendly format, ready for mass consumption.


    “Somehow this madness must cease. We must stop now. I speak as a child of God and brother to the suffering poor of Vietnam. I speak for those whose land is being laid waste, whose homes are being destroyed, whose culture is being subverted. I speak for the poor of America who are paying the double price of smashed hopes at home and death and corruption in Vietnam. I speak as a citizen of the world, for the world as it stands aghast at the path we have taken. I speak as an American to the leaders of my own nation. The great initiative in this war is ours. The initiative to stop it must be ours.” – excerpt

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s